Do You Suffer From Any Irrational Attitudes of Submission to Authority?
EXCERPT FROM NOAM CHOMSKY’S MANUFACTURING CONSENT:
QUESTION: … You outlined a model — filters that propaganda is sent through, on its way to the public. Can you briefly outline those?
CHOMSKY: It’s basically an institutional analysis of the major media, what we call a propaganda model. We’re talking primarily about the national media, those media that sort of set a general agenda that others more or less adhere to, to the extent that they even pay much attention to national or international affairs.
Now the elite media are sort of the agenda-setting media. That means The New York Times, The Washington Post, the major television channels, and so on. They set the general framework. Local media more or less adapt to their structure.
And they do this in all sorts of ways: by selection of topics, by distribution of concerns, by emphasis and framing of issues, by filtering of information, by bounding of debate within certain limits. They determine, they select, they shape, they control, they restrict — in order to serve the interests of dominant, elite groups in the society.
The New York Times is certainly the most important newspaper in the United States, and one could argue the most important newspaper in the world. The New York Times plays an enormous role in shaping the perception of the current world on the part of the politically active, educated classes. Also The New York Times has a special role, and I believe its editors probably feel that they bear a heavy burden, in the sense that The New York Times creates history.
That is, history is what appears in The New York Times archives; the place where people will go to find out what happened is The New York Times. Therefore it’s extremely important if history is going to be shaped in an appropriate way, that certain things appear, certain things not appear, certain questions be asked, other questions be ignored, and that issues be framed in a particular fashion. Now in whose interests is history being so shaped? Well, I think that’s not very difficult to answer.
Now, to eliminate confusion, all of this has nothing to do with liberal or conservative bias. According to the propaganda model, both liberal and conservative wings of the media — whatever those terms are supposed to mean — fall within the same framework of assumptions.
In fact, if the system functions well, it ought to have a liberal bias, or at least appear to. Because if it appears to have a liberal bias, that will serve to bound thought even more effectively.
In other words, if the press is indeed adversarial and liberal and all these bad things, then how can I go beyond it? They’re already so extreme in their opposition to power that to go beyond it would be to take off from the planet. So therefore it must be that the presuppositions that are accepted in the liberal media are sacrosanct — can’t go beyond them. And a well-functioning system would in fact have a bias of that kind. The media would then serve to say in effect: Thus far and no further.
We ask what would you expect of those media on just relatively uncontroversial, guided-free market assumptions? And when you look at them you find a number of major factors determining what their products are. These are what we call the filters, so one of them, for example, is ownership. Who owns them?
The major agenda-setting media — after all, what are they? As institutions in the society, what are they? Well, in the first place they are major corporations, in fact huge corporations. Furthermore, they are integrated with and sometimes owned by even larger corporations, conglomerates — so, for example, by Westinghouse and G.E. and so on.
So what we have in the first place is major corporations which are parts of even bigger conglomerates. Now, like any other corporation, they have a product which they sell to a market. The market is advertisers — that is, other businesses. What keeps the media functioning is not the audience. They make money from their advertisers. And remember, we’re talking about the elite media. So they’re trying to sell a good product, a product which raises advertising rates. And ask your friends in the advertising industry. That means that they want to adjust their audience to the more elite and affluent audience. That raises advertising rates. So what you have is institutions, corporations, big corporations, that are selling relatively privileged audiences to other businesses.
Well, what point of view would you expect to come out of this? I mean without any further assumptions, what you’d predict is that what comes out is a picture of the world, a perception of the world, that satisfies the needs and the interests and the perceptions of the sellers, the buyers and the product.
Now there are many other factors that press in the same direction. If people try to enter the system who don’t have that point of view they’re likely to be excluded somewhere along the way. After all, no institution is going to happily design a mechanism to self-destruct. It’s not the way institutions function. So they’ll work to exclude or marginalize or eliminate dissenting voices or alternative perspectives and so on because they’re dysfunctional, they’re dysfunctional to the institution itself.
Now there are other media too whose basic social role is quite different: it’s diversion. There’s the real mass media-the kinds that are aimed at, you know, Joe Six Pack — that kind. The purpose of those media is just to dull people’s brains.
This is an oversimplification, but for the eighty percent or whatever they are, the main thing is to divert them. To get them to watch National Football League. And to worry about “Mother With Child With Six Heads,” or whatever you pick up on the supermarket stands and so on. Or look at astrology. Or get involved in fundamentalist stuff or something or other. Just get them away. Get them away from things that matter. And for that it’s important to reduce their capacity to think.
Take, say, sports — that’s another crucial example of the indoctrination system, in my view. For one thing because it — you know, it offers people something to pay attention to that’s of no importance. [audience laughs] That keeps them from worrying about — [applause] keeps them from worrying about things that matter to their lives that they might have some idea of doing something about. And in fact it’s striking to see the intelligence that’s used by ordinary people in [discussions of] sports [as opposed to political and social issues]. I mean, you listen to radio stations where people call in — they have the most exotic information [more laughter] and understanding about all kind of arcane issues. And the press undoubtedly does a lot with this.
You know, I remember in high school, already I was pretty old. I suddenly asked myself at one point, why do I care if my high school team wins the football game? [laughter] I mean, I don’t know anybody on the team, you know? [audience roars] I mean, they have nothing to do with me, I mean, why I am cheering for my team? It doesn’t mean any — it doesn’t make sense. But the point is, it does make sense: it’s a way of building up irrational attitudes of submission to authority, and group cohesion behind leadership elements — in fact, it’s training in irrational jingoism. That’s also a feature of competitive sports. I think if you look closely at these things, I think, typically, they do have functions, and that’s why energy is devoted to supporting them and creating a basis for them and advertisers are willing to pay for them and so on.
- drdosolittle reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- drdosolittle likes this
- thisnightmarishlife reblogged this from bronxguerrilla27
- thisnightmarishlife likes this
- gonzolinzo reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- gonzolinzo likes this
- radkev reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- fallintoyourarmstonight reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- pattadak reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- 8-5-5-10 likes this
- orlofsky reblogged this from communistmom
- communistmom reblogged this from mutualassureddistraction
- communistmom likes this
- mutualassureddistraction reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- meghanmaygun reblogged this from bedangeroustogether
- meghanmaygun likes this
- beemill likes this
- trafalgar-rgh likes this
- samthomasisanasshole reblogged this from bedangeroustogether
- samthomasisanasshole likes this
- thesubversivesound likes this
- bedangeroustogether reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- massivemeasure likes this
- victoria-deanna reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- bummingdharma reblogged this from noam-chomsky and added:
- stevencarey reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- adereth likes this
- worsethandetroit likes this
- grinderbot reblogged this from idlnmclean
- sowasred likes this
- eliasgrover reblogged this from thedeathofneon
- idlnmclean reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- thedeathofneon reblogged this from lentiginous
- dasypoda likes this
- lentiginous reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- werepartofthemasterplan reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- werepartofthemasterplan likes this
- theveganarchist likes this
- sungazersounds likes this
- kinneyx-23 likes this
- humvnbean reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- universoconsciente likes this
- only-mirrors-watch-me reblogged this from inspirement
- spaceninjasfromouterspace likes this
- king-motherfxckin-taj likes this
- autopilotsoul likes this
- thegreatblueheron likes this
- echooftheelements likes this
- sothisiscool reblogged this from noam-chomsky
- sculpturedchaos likes this